On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Jens Lohne Eftang wrote:

> That helps a lot. Now I also do the static allocation, but in addition 
> reducing io_blksize to 2560 knocked another 180 seconds off the computation 
> time.
>
> The time for reading in the 1GB of data is now 20 seconds (all calls to 
> read_serialized_vector), which I still find a bit too much, but obviously way 
> better than before. Thanks!

Something's not adding up (subtracting up?) for me - 360 seconds
originally, minus 80 seconds with static allocation, minus 180 seconds
with reduced block size, gives me 100 seconds left, not 20.

Also: what does the time come out to if you do the reduced block size
but not the static allocation?  That's the case that I'm particularly
interested in, since we could commit something approximating it to
svn.
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to