On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jed Brown <j...@59a2.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Paul T. Bauman <ptbau...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jed Brown <j...@59a2.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Is this frequency-domain? Do you have a purely negative shift or is there >>> damping? >> >> >> That example is a very simple, real-valued curl curl u + u = f, where f >> is based on a smooth manufactured solution. It's only there to test that I >> implemented Nedelec elements correctly. >> > > The positive shift is a good thing. Do you need a high-performance solver? >
For the test problem, no. For the coupled magnetostatics problem I'm working on that will use the Nedelec element capability - yes. But I'm not far enough along yet to start down that road (still debugging/characterizing application). But it's in terms of potentials anyway, so I'm dealing with Laplace coupled to curl curl = f (coupled to other things), so the analogy to the test problem is not really good anyway. But maybe I'm misunderstanding where you're going? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
