On 12/12/2012 10:04 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:35 PM, Jens Lohne Eftang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> and repeat your experiment, replying with the results again for the first 
>>> three nodes, also with the
>>> node->debug_buffer() as before?
>>>
>>> I'd expect system 0, vars 0,1,2 to have ids 0, 96, and 192, respectively, 
>>> from this buffer:
>>>
>>> [ 2 8 257 0 257 96 257 192 257 0 ]
>> Thanks. Here's the output from the first node in the iteration:
>>
>> base_idx, var, vg, vig, ncg, comp=0 0 0 0 1 0
>> base_idx, var, vg, vig, ncg, comp=0 0 0 0 1 0
>>   [ 2 8 257 0 257 96 257 192 257 0 ]
>>
>> ... I suspect an indication that's something's not quite right...
> I'm going to create a unit test to set this exact buffer and make things are 
> as they should be.  It'll be tomorrow before I'm able to finish it up though. 
>  I am running problems with multiple systems and multiple variables per 
> system with no issue...
>
> I'm still confused if this bug is a result of my recent patch or not?
>
> If you
>
> $ svn up -r 6520 .
>
> in your top-level directory and try that build - what happens?
I get the same behavior as with 6525.

Thanks,
Jens

>
> -Ben
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to