What are you trying to do? There are many scenarios where this could fail... and some where it might succeed.
Derek Sent from my iPad On May 24, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 24, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Derek Gaston <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes. >> >> Ok, well, MeshFunction itself doesn't care (as you found out)... but >> if you want to evaluate your solution in elements containing >> off-processor degrees of freedom then you need to serialize that >> vector. > > > But if the element is on a given processor, then wouldn't the local portion > of system.solution contain all the relevant dofs to calculate the solution on > that element? > > If so, then passing it the system.solution should be alright. No? > > >> Think of it this way: MeshFunction doesn't do parallel >> communication... you are responsible for feeding it the values you >> need. >> >> Derek >> >> Sent from my iPad > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
