On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:42 PM, John Peterson <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Manav,
>>
>> There is some good stuff in here, particularly
>> the _nonhermitian_eig_lapack stuff.
>>
>> I'd like to get it into libmesh, do you have any test codes that verify
>> it is working?
>>
>> --
>> John
>>
>
> I am not sure if I have verified this code. I had started to add this a
> few months ago, but then it became unnecessary and I never got around to
> veryfying the code.
> I can test it at my end, and send you an updated patch if needed?
>

That would be good, but it would be even better if we had a very short
libmesh code that also demonstrated it working (not a full application
code).

It looks like it's designed to work when Number=Real, but I wonder if
you've tested that it compiles with Number=std::complex?

Also, what do you envision the user-facing interface for
_nonhermitian_eig_lapack
should be?  For example, lu_solve, cholesky_solve, and svd call some
underlying Lapack routines.  DenseMatrix::eig() maybe?


-- 
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to