On 05/09/2014 11:25 AM, John Peterson wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Povolotskyi > <mpovo...@purdue.edu <mailto:mpovo...@purdue.edu>> wrote: > > When the official release with the patch is going to happen? > > > Hard to say, we aren't on a very regular release schedule. > > And this wasn't a regression per se, so I don't think it's worth > rushing an official point release out the door. (I also may have > broken some of the less-used compiler configurations which I don't > test but I think Roy and Ben's buildbots do.) > > Although we probably should start the discussion since the last one > was almost 3 months ago. > > -- > John
This issue was important for us because we got conflicts between Libmesh symbols such as DenseMatrix and our DenseMatrix class. We simply could not compile the code. Before the next release we will have to carry the patch with us and distribute it to our customers, which gives them a bad impression. So, if the new release comes soon, we'll be very happy. Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
