I used GMVIO(mesh).write("output.gmv");

--Junchao Zhang

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Derek Gaston <fried...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What file format were you using to write the mesh out and view it in
> Paraview?
>
> Derek
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:14 PM Junchao Zhang <junchao.zh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> <<forgot to add the mailing list, so I resend it>>
>>
>> In addition, I did more experiments.  I increased the input mesh size, let
>> it has 64 elements and ran with 12 processes. It looks libmesh keeps the
>> original partition (got when the mesh is read in) unchanged, and does not
>> do repartitioning after refinement. I observed it from viewing output mesh
>> in paraview.
>> So the question is under what conditions mesh repartitioning will be
>> triggered in libmesh?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> --Junchao Zhang
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Junchao Zhang <junchao.zh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, John,
>> >
>> > Attached are my naive AMR (adapted from adaptivity_ex2.C) and its
>> input. I
>> > compiled it with  `libmesh-config --cxx` -o amr_libmesh
>> > ../examples/amr_libmesh.cpp `libmesh-config --cxxflags --include
>> --ldflags
>> > --libs` and ran it with mpirun -n 5 ./amr_libmesh -niter 5
>> > I opened output.gmv and I could only see partitions on four
>> processors.  I
>> > don't know where I can call mesh.partition(n).
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > --Junchao Zhang
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:26 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Junchao Zhang <junchao.zh...@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>    I am writing a simple AMR code with libmesh. My input mesh has 4
>> >>> elements. I use ParallelMesh.  I found I could not distribute it to
>> more
>> >>> than four processes even after refinement.
>> >>>    In my code, I firstly do mesh.read("mesh.xda"). I find libmesh
>> reads
>> >>> the
>> >>> data and distributes it on four processes, and mesh._is_serial is set
>> to
>> >>> false.  After that, I call
>> mesh_refinement.refine_and_coarsen_elements(),
>> >>> which calls _mesh.prepare_for_use (), and then this->partition().
>> But in
>> >>> mesh_base.C, since this->is_serial() is false, the partitioner never
>> gets
>> >>> called.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What happens if you call mesh.partition(n) directly?
>> >>
>> >> Please post your entire code so we can take a look.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libmesh-users mailing list
>> Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to