Now that sounds pretty cool! I like that solution. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:45 PM Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, John Peterson wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Cody Permann <codyperm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> TL;DR; > >> I have a need for retrieving just the ghosted elements on a given > processor > >> or to put it another way, the difference of the semi-local and local > >> elements. > >> > >> My current plan is to pass the begin/end iterators of these two methods > to > >> the set_difference() algorithm. Does anyone have a different or better > way? > >> > > > > Hmm... ghosted elements are semi-local but not local, correct? > > > > I'd loop over the elements and only keep the ones for which > > > > elem->is_semilocal() && (elem->processor_id() != mesh.processor_id()) > > > > Unless I misunderstand the definition of semi-locality. > > John, you imported the fancy iterator stuff, right? Would it be hard > to add a "ghost_elements_begin()"/"ghost_elements_end()" with a > multi-predicate? > --- > Roy > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
