On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Antonio Cervone <ant.cerv...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> this is due to a recent change in archlinux package, see
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/46431 and
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43378
> I hope they will revert this change back, in the mean time check
>
>
> https://github.com/capitalaslash/libmesh/commit/1fa8fc38944d719e8e7ada35bc345e21d94eeaca
>
> for a temporary workraound.
>

Thanks for the extra information, Antonio.

I have been wondering why VTK went with this naming scheme, how distros
would eventually handle it, and why on earth they don't provide some kind
of "vtk-config --libs" script that would help out with the issue.

Do you think it's worth trying to actually support the distros' alternate
naming scheme in libmesh's m4 files?  I don't think it would be too
difficult.  Other than Arch and Fedora, are there any others that do this?

-- 
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-scale, agent-less Infrastructure Monitoring from a single dashboard
Integrate with 40+ ManageEngine ITSM Solutions for complete visibility
Physical-Virtual-Cloud Infrastructure monitoring from one console
Real user monitoring with APM Insights and performance trend reports 
Learn More http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=247754911&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to