> > I'm not sure what one thing (Delaunay mesh) has to do with the other (low > order finite volume discretizations)?
I think it has to do with elements having obtuse angles. Delaunay mesh > doesn't have obtuse angles so the centroid of the element lies inside it. Sorry I meant to say that the control volume will go beyond the element if the element has obtuse angles. I want to solve an elliptic second order PDE with vertex centered finite volume method. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Harshad Sahasrabudhe <hsaha...@purdue.edu> wrote: > I'm not sure what one thing (Delaunay mesh) has to do with the other (low >> order finite volume discretizations)? > > > I think it has to do with elements having obtuse angles. Delaunay mesh > doesn't have obtuse angles so the centroid of the element lies inside it. > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:39 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Harshad Sahasrabudhe < >> hsaha...@purdue.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hi Roy, >>> >>> Thanks for the reply. Do I need to have a Delaunay mesh for p_order=0? I >>> probably need a low order discretization. >>> >> >> I'm not sure what one thing (Delaunay mesh) has to do with the other (low >> order finite volume discretizations)? >> >> -- >> John >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
