On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:47 PM, David Knezevic <
> david.kneze...@akselos.com> wrote:
>
>> If I do a solve with different numbers of processes, and write out Exodus
>> files in each case, and then use ncdump to compare at the ASCII version of
>> each file, I can see that the two files are the same (up to machine
>> precision).
>>
>> I initially assumed that the exodus data would be partition dependent, but
>> I guess that isn't the case? Do we reorder to node numbering to ensure
>> that
>> the output is partition-independent. I know we do that for xdr files
>> (EquationSystems::write() takes a partition_agnostic argument), but I
>> didn't realize we do it for other formats as well? If someone can shed
>> light on this, that'd be appreciated.
>>
>
> I believe the Exodus files may always be the same since, for parallel
> meshes, they get passed through a MeshSerializer object before being
> written...
>

I'm using a SerialMesh, though. Even in the SerialMesh case I would have
thought the exodus file would depend on the numbering of nodes and elems,
which is partition dependent, but apparently not?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to