On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Alam, Jahrul <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for the clarification. Can you suggest a work around? If I do, > mesh0.read(lshaped_0.vtu) and mesh1.read(lshaped_1.vtu), and so on, is it > possible to end up with a DistributedMesh by combining mesh0, > mesh1,............. at the user level? > > Or, is there another format that supports parallel read and write? >
I wouldn't worry about parallel read/write until you get to a point that you are working with a Mesh that's too big to even be opened on one processor. Your code can still run in parallel even when you read a mesh in serial. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
