MOOSE does not make use of libMesh::DifferentiablePhysics

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:39 PM Bin Liu <learninglibm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> John mentioned about MOOSE library, which is built on top of libmesh. Does
> MOOSE library make use of "libMesh::DifferentiablePhysics" class? It seems
> MOOSE library can deal with the multi-physics problems with dynamic mesh in
> libmesh library quite well. By the way, while sub-dividing an element based
> on the coordinates extracted by "elem->point()", I noticed that the
> truncation error of the coordinates of element nodes is relative large.
> Please correct me, if I am wrong about this. Could it be the reason to
> affect the convergence rate?
>
> Best
> Bin
> ________________________________
> From: Stogner, Roy H <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 6:41 AM
> To: Bin Liu <learninglibm...@hotmail.com>
> Cc: libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net <
> libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] ALE formulation with moving mesh
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Bin Liu wrote:
>
> > I find that libmesh indeed has a class
> > "libMesh::DifferentiablePhysics" to deal with ALE formulation.
>
> On top of what John said, I need to confess that the
> DifferentiablePhysics ALE code was never properly finished.  I got it
> to a state where it was running but didn't seem to be passing
> convergence tests, then the physics people on our project discovered a
> quasi-steady formulation which would work even better than our
> previous unsteay model, and so I didn't have any more time to devote
> to *fixing* the ALE code.
> ---
> Roy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libmesh-users mailing list
> Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
>

_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to