Indeed the 2616 is more detailed.

I totally agree in MHD be fully compatible with the 723x rfcs.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org>
wrote:

> That's because RFC 2616 describes the mechanism concisely and for the
> first time.  However, what is implemented should, to the best of my
> knowledge, be fully compatible with the 723x-RFCs as well.
>
> On 09/15/2016 06:06 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm not sure but it seems that rfc 2616 was deprecated by
> > rfcs 723X. Could anyone confirm this?
> >
> > I opened some 723x, eg: 7230, 7231, 7232 etc., and they have the
> > "Obsoletes: 2616" header.
> >
> > Thank you!
>

--
Silvio Cl├ęcio

Reply via email to