Hi
I tune configuration and add test, examples target. I have following test
results.
The following tests FAILED:
39 - tls_options (Failed)
43 - https_get_select (Failed)
44 - https_session_info (Failed)
Also I have trouble when I start src/examples/demo_https (it is build with
autotools). The server reports "Error: received handshake message out of
context" and chrome reports ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE.
Is it OK or I should investigate more?
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Štefan Bellus <stevo.bel...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> You can find cmake files for libmicrohttpd at https://github.com/sbellus/
> libmicrohttpd-cmake.
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Štefan Bellus <stevo.bel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok i will try to find time to finish configuration part of CMakeLists.txt
>> and add other target as well.
>>
>> Typed with thumbs.
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2017 2:57 PM, "Evgeny Grin" <k...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>> On 20.07.2017 10:22, Štefan Bellus wrote:
>> > Sorry That I do no reply on mails, but I did not received any even if I
>> > am subscribed.
>> > I only noticed your reply in archive.
>>
>> Try to check "spam".
>>
>> >> By using CMake we could get rid of MSVC projects, but maintaining
>> > CMake is way harder then MSVC project in current state
>> >
>> > Yes. The benefit will be achieved only if you use only CMake. No
>> > autotools, MSVC projects.
>> > I convert the autotools to CMake to check if possible to replace it with
>> > CMake.
>> > I found out that it is possible. It take me 2 days to convert it. But it
>> > not waste of time. I learn how to configure sources in CMake and I learn
>> > also how autotools configure sources.
>>
>> I suggest you to put your result to some public repo. May be others will
>> find your CMake setup useful.
>>
>> >> What about meson?
>> >
>> > It is cool. The syntax is nice. They keep the idea of describing the
>> > build in general language and
>> > let the back-end (CMake or meson) to generate specific commands for
>> > underlying build systems.
>> > The syntax of this general language is much better in meson.
>> > I votes for meson :)
>> > I am little bit skeptic because more and more people start to use CMake
>> > nowadays. But meson is written in python and a lot of more people can
>> > use python as C/CPP (CMake is written in C/CPP) and contribute to meson.
>> > I guess if meson also introduce some package manager for C (something
>> > like Java maven repositories or C# Nuget) they will win.
>> >
>> > I am a maintainer of project that depends on your library. I would love
>> > if you can provide same build system on all platforms. It really make
>> > thinks easier.
>>
>> As I said, you can try to maintain your CMake configuration. If there
>> will be mass demand for CMake, we could come back to this question.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Wishes,
>> Evgeny Grin
>>
>>
>>
>
