Hi Tim,
Thanks for forwarding the report. I've looked through them. The first
two clang is pissy because we don't annotate with 'nonnull'. Doing so
*consistently* would be a lot of work, if someone wants to do so,
great, but I won't for the near future.
The "logic error" (NULL dereference) looks very much like a logic error
in CLANG. It boils down to:
state = 42;
ptr = NULL;
switch (state)
{
case 42:
perfectly safe;
break;
case 44:
deref ptr;
break;
}
and clang goes for the wrong case (44) even though 42 was just set 5
statements above. So yes, a logic error, but in clang ;-).
Happy hacking!
Christian
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 15:33 +0100, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> there is no online version. I regenerated the report and attached it.
> Unpack and view it with
>
> tar xf scan-build.tgz
> xdg-open scan-build/index.html
>
> And sorry that I can't fix it myself (out of time currently).
>
> Regards, Tim
>
> On 2/3/20 3:18 PM, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> > Could you please send the link to the report?
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 12:23 +0100, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > with clang 8.0.1 static analyzer you'll get "scan-build: 8 bugs
> > > found."
> > > on latest master (b8a0f69866a82ae186cfaba955bba5e3f8d9df3e).
> > >
> > > CC=clang ./configure
> > > scan-build --use-cc=clang make -j$(nproc)
> > >
> > > Regards, Tim
> > >
