Good evening again, Lowell! Lowell C. Savage wrote to Frank Reichert...
I previously wrote to you with regard to your reply to Jay P. Hailey: > > Bull! Where did you come up with this one? To which, you replied: > It's the way the system works. I understand you don't like it. But if you > really want to make it so that the people elected from your district don't > represent you, move or renounce your citizenship. Much as I hated to admit > it, Slick Willy represented me to the world for 8 years. This is still bullshit, Lowell. I for one, never signed any contract whatsoever that would suggest that either 'Slick Willy' or the current fascist Shrub Regime<tm> represents ME! Since I voted against both regimes, and outspokenly over 5 1/2 years of both, from 1997 through 2003 in the Philippines without 'renouncing my citizenship' or doing any other such things as you suggest, I suggest you rethink this thing about 'representation based upon a supposed contract' that you never signed on to. An election ballot to me is a very important document. When you enter the voting booth you have the one and only chance to make a choice over who will represent you. If you lose, then by default, you aren't represented at all, since you never voted for the prostitute politician that the majority may have or did vote for. Your argumentation here reminds me a lot of the war crimes trials subsequent from WWII, when hosts of individuals were brought to trial for war crimes. Many of them, as you may recall, claimed they were only following orders. Well, many were either incarcerated or put to death upon the pretext that individuals must make a choice to obey orders, or else do the right thing and protect those individuals who are victims of ordering criminal acts to take place. This isn't really such a giant stretch either considering that much of what is occuring right now in Iraq under the Shrub Regimes<tm> orders. I would, without hesitation, anywhere in this entire planet, denounce this regime as a renegage and lawless regime, and I refuse to obey it insofar as I can possible do so, or support it, and it does not represent ME, as an American whatsoever! Now, put that under your hat and wear it! I also took note earlier, that you had some mental problems with my description of Condom-loser Rice, suggesting that I might have a credibility problem here. Well Lowell, I doubt I have a credibility problem at all, since everyone here ought to already know that I strongly oppose the current US regime in power in this country, and believe equally as strongly that it is morally destitute in terms of US foreign policy, economic and domestic policy, and probably bordering on a fascist police state as we speak. Now, based upon what I just wrote, do you believe I might have a credibility problem here? I believe YOU might have a credibility problem here since you seem to suggest that whoever manages to con their way into public office represents YOU! They certainly DO NOT represent me if I didn't vote for the bastards in the first place. If you suggest that whoever wins an election and pulls off the same immoral policies as the current and former regimes in this country, then sir, YOU have a giant of a credibility problem to resolve in your own right. Kindest regards, Frank _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
