Good evening, Bill!

Bill Smyth forwarded to Frank Reichert:

After much study and deliberation... perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS. It would be difficult for them to be both good Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish ...it's still the truth.
In light of this is it possible to have a democracy in Iraq?
The war is bigger than we know.

An interesting summary, no doubt... however,

This obviously leaves out a lot of stuff. We've supported and imported thousands of Muslims into this country, and continue to do so under a premise that invites abuse, without considering that Muslims have no higher authority other than their duty to Allah [God] [sic] and to convert this country by force into a fundamentalist Islamic State.

Although the same could be said regarding orthodox Christians, this seems to beg the question insofar as historically at least, most traditional immigration to America in prior times were largely Christian sects, including of course, current immigration in the form of Hispanic immigrants coming to this country illegally, that are still within this definition of being largely of Christian origin.

It ought to be pointed out by someone here, since it probably won't, so I'll just do it myself; since very few apologists for religion exist within the Libertarian Party or movement, that we seem to have a philosophical disinterest in a possible Muslim infiltration that perhaps or probably does indicate we have a third column amongst us today determined to remake America into a fundamentalist Islamic State.

Sadly, there is no answer here that can presently be contemplated, since the number of Muslims in this country today, many of which enjoy U.S. citizenship either by birth, or at best, naturalization procedures, than to make this a critical issue in terms of a majority of people with guns and ammunition, and the authority of the individual to use such weapons against each other to enforce there own rights to enjoy their own property or way of life, since government itself in this country has now become totally secular and is in itself, unable to provide any defense whatsoever in terms of a growing Muslim menace to Western civilization as such.

The U.S. government, by choice and through an illegal and wrongful allegiance to Democracy, has finally become unable to legally deal with or check the real threat that is now amongst us. In such a context, this government will ultimately and largely become irrelevant and incapable of defending Christians, or other religious convictions against any assumptions by main stream Islamics, regarding a religious take-over over our original and Constitutional intents, whatever previous arguments might suggest. They intend ultimately to do that through force; and only force against that threat will be the ultimate and deciding factor will determine the outcome.

We have about 1,500 years of experience in how this has worked itself out in the history in Western civilization. Although technology has changed a great deal, I doubt that this issue will have changed very much at all.

We are dealing with an experienced enemy that knows history very well, and a history we have largely become complacent or have forgotten about. It's here. It is among us, and it's here now!

Most of this will certainly become evident in due course.

Kindest regards,
Frank




_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
Libnw@immosys.com
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw

Reply via email to