On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]> wrote: > These new volume IDs were added
But you are not adding new IDs (even if you're generalizing the pattern to include more IDs). Also, please don't refer to change in the patch itself in the past tense unless you make it obvious that you are talking of change in the patch itself. > based on mimicking the already known > ones for x86 and x86_64. > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]> > --- > data/os/microsoft.com/win-10.xml.in | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/data/os/microsoft.com/win-10.xml.in > b/data/os/microsoft.com/win-10.xml.in > index 980898d..23fbea3 100644 > --- a/data/os/microsoft.com/win-10.xml.in > +++ b/data/os/microsoft.com/win-10.xml.in > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > <media arch="i686"> > <variant id="education"/> > <iso> > - <volume-id>J_CEDA_X86FRE_</volume-id> > + <volume-id>J_CEDN?A_X86FRE_</volume-id> > <publisher-id>MICROSOFT CORPORATION</publisher-id> > <l10n-language regex="true" > l10n-language-map="http://microsoft.com/win/8/l10n-language";>[[:upper:][:digit:]_]*_([[:upper:]]*-[[:upper:]]*)</l10n-language> > </iso> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ > <media arch="x86_64"> > <variant id="education"/> > <iso> > - <volume-id>J_CEDNA_X64FRE_</volume-id> > + <volume-id>J_CEDN?A_X64FRE_</volume-id> > <publisher-id>MICROSOFT CORPORATION</publisher-id> > <l10n-language regex="true" > l10n-language-map="http://microsoft.com/win/8/l10n-language";>[[:upper:][:digit:]_]*_([[:upper:]]*-[[:upper:]]*)</l10n-language> > </iso> > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Libosinfo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
