This commit is just preparing the ground for changes that will come in
the next commits where we'll start supporting "removed" devices and in
order to so, we'll have to explicitly call _get_device_links_internal()
forcing it to return *all* devices, even the "removed" ones, as they'll
be filtered out later.

https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db/issues/13

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <[email protected]>
---
 osinfo/osinfo_os.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/osinfo/osinfo_os.c b/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
index 62d19f8..cbc4459 100644
--- a/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
+++ b/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
@@ -385,8 +385,9 @@ static void get_all_device_links_cb(OsinfoProduct *product, 
gpointer user_data)
     g_return_if_fail(OSINFO_IS_OS(product));
 
     foreach_data = (struct GetAllDeviceLinksData *)user_data;
-    device_links = osinfo_os_get_device_links(OSINFO_OS(product),
-                                              foreach_data->filter);
+    device_links = osinfo_os_get_device_links_internal(OSINFO_OS(product),
+                                                       foreach_data->filter,
+                                                       TRUE);
     tmp_list = osinfo_list_new_union(OSINFO_LIST(foreach_data->device_links),
                                      OSINFO_LIST(device_links));
     g_object_unref(foreach_data->device_links);
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo

Reply via email to