On Friday, 23 November 2018 11:54:40 CET Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> +static void
> +test_filter(void)
> +{
> + OsinfoImageList *list1 = osinfo_imagelist_new();
> + OsinfoImageList *list2;
> + OsinfoFilter *filter = osinfo_filter_new();
> + OsinfoImage *ent1 = osinfo_image_new("foo1", "x86_64", "qcow2");
> + OsinfoImage *ent2 = osinfo_image_new("foo2", "x86_64", "raw");
> + OsinfoImage *ent3 = osinfo_image_new("foo3", "i686", "raw");
> + OsinfoImage *ent4 = osinfo_image_new("foo4", "i686", "qcow2");
> +
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent1), "class", "network");
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent1), "class", "wilma");
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent2), "class", "network");
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent3), "class", "network");
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent3), "class", "audio");
> + osinfo_entity_add_param(OSINFO_ENTITY(ent4), "class", "audio");
> +
> + osinfo_filter_add_constraint(filter, "class", "network");Even if this is just a test, would not it better to use the actual properties of the images, i.e. architecture, and format? -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
