On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:28 PM Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/21/18 9:09 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fiden...@redhat.com> > > --- > > data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/ > centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > > index 8b3531e..cc583b9 100644 > > --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > > +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > > See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text > --> > > <os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0";> > > <short-id>centos7.0</short-id> > > + <short-id>centos7</short-id> > > <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name> > > <version>7.0</version> > > <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor> > > > > Huh I didn't know we could do that, but I see we do the same for debian > distros, so it makes sense > > Cole, I will end up dropping this patch. While we can do that (as in our schema allows that), there's no code on libosinfo that would properly deal with a second short-id. So, for now, I'll not go for this patch. > Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> > > - Cole >
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
