"Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, February 11, 2006 21:23, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> I've made a few small packaging changes against the current SVN,
>> attached below.  These just sync up the packaging with what's
>> currently in Debian.  Please could you consider applying them?
>
> They're in, thanks.  For some reason "patch" rejected the diff so I did it
> by hand--did you do anything special?

I just did "svn diff > patchfile", and mailed patchfile to you.

> One small thing--I may have asked this before, but should we really have a
> build dependency on such a recent version of libpq?  Any version from 7.3
> or so onwards should do for a working libpq.

This is the version present in Debian at the moment (testing and
unstable).  If you would prefer it to work with stable (sarge), then
the depdenncy on postgresql-dev, rather than libpq-dev is what you
need, in which case you can just revert the those changes in
debian/control.in (Depends and Build-Depends).


Regards,
Roger


-- 
Roger Leigh
                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
                Debian GNU/Linux        http://www.debian.org/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Attachment: pgpjTs3cfYGho.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Libpqxx-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/libpqxx-general

Reply via email to