On Wed, August 9, 2006 18:42, Bart Samwel wrote: > (Sidenote to Jeroen: why doesn't trigger have a copy constructor and > assignment operator? This is a bug, right?)
Hey, yes, you're right. Or more precisely: it's correct that it doesn't have them, but it shouldn't have implicit ones either. Copying triggers could have painful results. I'll block access to the copy constructor and copy assignment operator using the usual trick: declaring them private, and not defining them. Jeroen _______________________________________________ Libpqxx-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/libpqxx-general
