On Wed, September 13, 2006 20:34, Bart Samwel wrote: >> The point is that it IS stated in the section about building libpxx >> itself >> but not in the bit about libpq. That's the reason I assumed it was not >> needed. > > ACK, if it is listed in the one place, it should be listed in the other.
Ah, I missed that point: this is when building postgres itself. Okay, I've added it. Jeroen _______________________________________________ Libpqxx-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/libpqxx-general
