2015-07-04 19:10 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>:
> Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada, 04/07/2015 14:20: > >> Being most libraries non-profit and educational resources, I think that >> it is a special case. >> > > Not for the paperwork. Let's avoid throwing unwitting librarians into > crime. > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use#paid-contrib-disclosure > > You are being a bit picky. And... crime!? I said "we can ask the community" and my proposal is about _lists_ (list of items) not articles where "promotional" stuff can be hypothetically written. Also, what you linked is about paid editing _without disclosure_. We are talking about this in an open way, and any librarian can disclose it in his userpage if needed. Also, here[1] it says: "There are exceptions to the general advice that editors with a financial COI refrain from editing affected articles. Benign examples of editors being paid include Wikipedians collaborating with mission-aligned organizations such as galleries, libraries, archives and museums <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM>." Said that, I'm not interested in a wikilaw thread. Bye. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Paid_editing > Nemo > > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries >
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
