--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that we should break from the
> mold
> > of Apache development. I've seen good-intentioned
> > contributions to my subproject that definitely did
> not
> > meet production standards. However, while I favor
> 1a
> > in theory, in practice I prefer the Taglibs method
> > where there is a single pool of committers, but
> people
> > are careful about contributing to an unfamiliar
> > codebase. So my proposal is:
> >
> > (1c)
> >
> > There should be a single pool of Jakarta-util
> specific
> > committers with the standard process for committer
> > approval.
>
> How about if, in practice, we give all the library
> committers karma to
> the entire package library, but maintain a status
> file for each package
> with a list of active committers. We could then
> encourage an etiquette
> where a committer adds their name to the status file
> before making their
> first commit to a package. This may sound like red
> tape, but I do
> believe it would reinforce that each package is a
> product in its own
> right, and needs to be handled on its own terms.
That sounds like a very good idea.
> Does Taglibs do anything like this?
No, but maybe it should!
=====
Morgan Delagrange
Britannica.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
