Ted Husted wrote:
>
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > 1) Costin, Ignacio, etc. are concerned that the
> > Commons committers will incorrectly shoot down
> > legitimate components.
>
> I don't believe Costin and Ignacio are actually interested in proposing
> components to the Commons. Costin wants to use the shared CVS to host
> another model for sharing code -- "Agora". As I understand it, the
> release process here would not be controlled by the actual committers,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> but by the subprojects using the components.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What's the difference? Or, more precisely, what would the 'subproject
using the components' be other than a set of committers for the
component that are also involved in other projects that want to use it?
I don't see how in practice there is any reality to the notion of
'subproject using...' as different from 'actual committers'.
>
> Most of us were not interested in pursuing that model, but wanted to
> give Costin a chance to explore it further.
I still think its a good model - to me, it would have similar status as
any other Commons subproject in that the participants within make the
decisions for what goes on within.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
