Re: Agora and the Shared CVS

[Ted Husted]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly what I said - a jakarta subproject should be able to
> vote and take responsibility for distributing a product - it can be
> developed in it's own workspace or in a shared CVS.

I just don't understand what the problem is, Costin. Doesn't the
proposed #20 say that? 

If it makes any difference, we could probably strike "the accepted to
the commons part", and just say 

"20. A CVS repository will be available to all Jakarta committers as a
workplace for new packages or other projects. Before release to the
public, code or documentation developed here must be sponsored by a
Jakarta subproject. The sponsoring subproject will distribute the code
or documentation along with the rest of their codebase."

-Ted.