On 24/5/09 11:15, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 24/5/09 10:51, Tim Dobson wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> Libre.fm should work this to their advantage. >> >> http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/22/deny-this-lastfm/ >> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/23/2149255&art_pos=5 > > Yep. But bear in mind these remain unconfirmed rumours. We should bear > in mind that libre.fm is based largely on copying the work of the > last.fm team, and they deserve to be treated respectfully. It is natural > for users of last.fm to be looking around for work-a-like systems that > have different privacy policies and risks, and libre.fm should be there > with a clear message deserving of links from techcrunch, slashdot etc. > But there's no need for anyone hear to bad-mouth last.fm to achieve this...
I'll just follow up on this briefly in case it is misread: I don't mean to suggest that anyone here (last of all Tim) is bad-mouthing last.fm currently. Just that we should avoid any temptation to do so that is posed by the current rumours... cheers Dan _______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
