Ted Smith wrote: > This comes back to the same question, though: what if an album is > composed of some free tracks, and some non-free tracks? Does that > qualify as free or non free? What if an artist began distributing > non-free music, but later changed to a free model, are they always a > "non-free artist"?
We'd list the free tracks like we list other free tracks. We'd list the non-free ones as we list Radiohead, The Beatles, etc. If an artist releases free music, they should be rewarded, regardless of what they did previously. We have to assume that this will be the case for virtually every musician. FWIW, I've yet to see one of these 'mixed' albums... _______________________________________________ Libre-fm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.autonomo.us/mailman/listinfo/libre-fm
