Indeed as mentioned before it is defined to:
register "gpu_backlight" = "0x879F879E"

Question is, what should it become to avoid the whining?
0x79417940 as in the comments?
0x6100610 as in the patch on
http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/6731/7/src/northbridge/intel/i945/gma.c that
hardcoded the value and removed gpu_backlight?

(if anyone else uses a 1400x1050 screen I'd be interested to know if it's
the case with "native" screens too)

Also, is anyone else experiencing the suspend2ram issues? The kernel is
booted with i915.fastboot=1 but I don't think it happened before. (I can
try with an older kernel)

Thanks
Charles

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:50 AM, The Gluglug <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> BLC_PWM_CTL is in src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/devicetree.cb, see
> gpu_brightness or gpu_backlight or something like that. You can change
> the value there.
>
> On 06/04/15 05:54, Charles Devereaux wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On my X60 tablet, after a screen swap for a 1400x1050 screen, I
> > started noticing a whine. The noise is proportional to the
> > reduction of the backlight and doesn't happen at full brightness. I
> > never noticed it before.
> >
> > It happens regardless of how I change the backlight (fn+home/end,
> > xbacklight, custom script reading and writing to
> > /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness) so I suspect a
> > coreboot issue.
> >
> > I am currently using an old libreboot based on head
> > 8ffc085e1affaabbe3dca8ac6a89346b71dfc02e with #5345, #7050, #7051,
> > but not #6731 and #7049 (since they were dropped and I do not need
> > acpi backlight) that works just fine, so I am a bit reluctant to
> > change it.
> >
> > Apparently #6731 and #7049 had the same problem: "some lower
> > brightness levels make the high-pitched noise", which was fixed cf
> > http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/6731/
> >
> > After looking at the code, I see a note explaining how: "Francis
> > tested that like my noise issue it doesn't occur with a lower PWM
> > frequency.
> >
> > If we compute the frequency as (0x61 << 8) + (0x61 << 6) + 1 (the 1
> > is to allow legacy backlight brightness which the VGA ROM allows
> > and I don't know if it should be enabled) and duty cycle as (x <<
> > 8) + (x << 6) for x in 0xf, ..., 0x61, then both our issues are
> > solved.
> >
> > I don't know if the resulting value (0x79417940) gives low enough
> > frequency to cause flickering for other users: "
> >
> > I do not fully understand where or how the PWM frequency is set in
> > src/northbridge/intel/i945/gma.c. I never see that 0x79417940
> > either. the only thing I see in
> > http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/6731/7/src/northbridge/intel/i945/gma.c
> > is:
> >
> > write32(pmmio + BLC_PWM_CTL, 0x6100610);
> >
> > In the source of my libreboot, it is still:
> >
> > write32(pmmio + BLC_PWM_CTL, conf->gpu_backlight);
> >
> > With src/mainboard/lenovo/x60/devicetree.cb setting it with:
> >
> > register "gpu_backlight" = "0x879F879E"
> >
> > Should it get changed to:
> >
> > write32(pmmio + BLC_PWM_CTL, 0x79417940) The other thing I noticed
> > were kernel warnings on wakeup from suspend2ram: [54557.710112]
> > [drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch in
> > gmch_pfit.pgm_ratios (expected 24183152, found 24117616)
> > [54557.710114] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [54557.710121]
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1432 at
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:9541
> > check_crtc_state+0x759/0xe31() [54557.710122] pipe state doesn't
> > match!
> >
> > It may be related.  Which coreboot head/patches is libreboot on the
> > X60 presently using?
> >
> > Thanks Charles
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVIh6qAAoJEP9Ft0z50c+UUCEIALbSvFrymaYCKs9d7YTnR5NC
> vJkvDNZ5NknB5Q8LjcQuhf9RQ+KMVgxF28sLWL7Bc9ikHgZvH1jH5ykAn7x4rBjO
> AUp2l+7NrUnziEllJDQPkfQksy45yMr/c8qZgBm+yeIEPAkM3zRc4k5LNhqmlaPI
> AhrUG1sFLt7EAvXqgnlq5jNr/8ogZh9A7Q4I2sWka4UmVj+VhZnG0XNu5a94GqYe
> HTyu0OgOYTiPwOQiVyzGPeN+dGYiz86aHyi49uv1nRlaowk8hNXa19prXuf6fVQV
> cczdPfs5CMFYBlGKjKz3lq2eg6ARKnuQVCH4wq0HaR0ztbUABwwY3UpWEd3FyJc=
> =1AmA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to