I'm aware, there would just be a big difference in the API if the library were C++ (classes, objects) instead of C (structs)
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 20:03 -0200, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva wrote: > Jake Abel wrote: > > Upon first impression I thought your library was written in C, but then I > > saw the email earlier about a C++ patch. If it's to be a C++ library, then > > the API probably ought to look like Autodesk's C++ ObjectARX API (not > > verbatim, of course). > > It is actually a C library. The "C++ patch" by James DuPont was just to > ensure more strict typecasting - it makes libredwg compile under g++, > but it is still C code. C code is compatible with C++ (as long as it > doesn't use any C++ reserved words as variable names), and C++ > applications can link directly to C libraries, dinamically or statically. > > > > >