ok,
I have removed the content of the includes via ifdef for the unattributed code.
my wrapper is getting better. committed a bunch of definitions, need
to add in some more parameters.
http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/InDirectDWG

On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:45 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
<jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ok
> here are the files.
>
> the only one that is not marked is the trivial class :
> OdBaseFileBuf.h
> OdBaseFileBuf.cpp
>
> I dont see any real IP in there, it is pretty simple.
>
> I will remove them and create an alternative from the code left over.
> thanks,
> mike
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Any exposure to liability is mine personally. This is not an official
>>> libredwg project.
>>>
>>> I am interested in getting OGR to use libredwg, and would work on
>>> doing that by working on the API.
>>>
>>> I will put some time into this as I have resources available.
>>> If opendwg wants to sue me, I am ready to fight them.
>>>
>>> The code that I am deriving this from
>>> (http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/spike/dxfdwg)  seems to have a bsd like
>>> open license and mentions no IP restrictions.
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> While not too relavent to you, that code was moved to spike specifically
>> because it included a modified include file from dwgdirect.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>> My work is just to
>>>
>>> resolve compiler errors from compiling against my dummy types, in my
>>> opinion, there can be no IP claims against me for doing that.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I dont even see that there is any "substantial portions of the
>>> Software" in my header files, so I will license it under the AGPL 3.0.
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
>> warmer...@pobox.com
>> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to