https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159261
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 | |3080, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 | |9991, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 | |5608 Blocks| |113305, 103314 Version|unspecified |6.1.0.3 release --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- There is a distinction to be made between fonts bundled with LibreOffice installers, and what fonts are used by default for user's profile or found in the document templates (and to a lesser extent the UI). We've bundled Noto fonts (though just a subset since 6.0 for bug 103080) and dropped some unsupported fonts (bug 136604), so feasible to expand the Noto* bundling for l10n, or alternatively to provide via appropriate langpack or extension mechanism. However there would be interoperability issues moving "default" away from profile default Liberation templates, or the C* fonts. That has been the bigger concern when past suggestions for change have come up. Seems less of an issue now as shellnew templates are now 0-byte and so also pickup defaults from user profile [1]. But folks needing to interoperate using OOXML, i.e. with MS Office, are not well served. =-ref-= [1] bug 139991 and bug 139962 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103314 [Bug 103314] [META] Templates bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113305 [Bug 113305] [META] Bundled fonts bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
