https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159150
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1) > it makes sense to use "Edit Paths" for the dialog, because it's not really > about selecting paths. It's about adding or removing them. +1 (NAB) > What is the "multipath" dialog? SvxMultiPathDialog, seems not in use however. > Plus, this dialog is different: Tools > Options > LibreOffice > Paths > > AutoText > Edit > It allows choosing a default path, and does not list the internal path. True, that's ugly. > Heiko, what do you think? To me, it seems that that "Path..." button in the > AutoText dialog should instead open the same dialog as the one in the > Options dialog. Why do we need the configuration at all in this dialog? Maybe a path is being added when autotext is imported from a template. Which is only available for ancient Word formats. I suggest to drop it. I'm using autotext from a macro, and this is added to the path. Pointless to show it. To sum up, I suggest to remove interaction and code to import autotext from Word templates, and the access to path in this dialog. The configuration what path provides autotext should be done only via tools > options. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
