https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160271
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 | |9556, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 | |7485 CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Hmm, not sure we can call this "rotated cells", that remains open as bug 127485. Rather you've adjusted the 'Text orientation' for the respective cells. On left *btlr* with 'Vertical (bottom to top)' table orientation so just looks like left rotation, and on the right *tbrl* the 'Vertical (top to bottom)' table orientation so just looks like right rotation. OT fonts with actual vertical tables respond appropriately to the table orientation. However, there seems a legitimate difference with the handling of the symbol glyphs between btlr and tbrl orientation. And for OOXML interoperability Regina points out issues in see also bug 149556 @Miklos, you did the *btlr* dev that works correctly, was something to be done for the *tbrl* to get consistent results? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
