https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134869
Justin L <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | --- Comment #22 from Justin L <[email protected]> --- Using my own document as a test, I confirm the 6.0 bibisect from comment 11. In bibisect-linux-64-6.0, I got bibisect commit 75a5bb5fe97dc758e0a97b76c88f97b23c7dfd6b is the first bad commit one of this clump of commits: source sha:d74b26b41bfea3ba7a1834953b2bfe9b7ff0d70f source sha:1059e234f4b3b3f6b770b2e4d973923e54e7045b source sha:7d391f9a563041aae416c7017dcec36bbf4dfb2c source sha:4cee8018792c732aac638bd82c754ade915a4db9 source sha:c82cb453eb56fb37ad36cff6becde9d753eb829d source sha:da05b60cdb72d301c6b16c8cb31135f46f4ed2c0 // tagged in comment 11 source sha:51ee0c5ba6b0ffcd4b12e652de48e3f775cccc7d The example file I was using had some false positives in 5.4, where the header/footer line was occasionally leaving an image-wide artefact above or below the image. I don't think Armin's commit is truly a regression. I think it is finally showing (some of) the text boundaries that were intended to be shown. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
