https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160005

--- Comment #4 from Philippe Cloutier <chea...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #2)
> [...]

Thank you Stephan

> (In reply to Philippe Cloutier from comment #0)
> > I am skeptical that I did opt out from Online Update, but if I did, that
> > could have been due to its description (STR_DESC_MODULE_OPT_ONLINEUPDATE):
> > > Get automatically notified when a new update of %PRODUCTNAME becomes 
> > > available.    (English)
> > > Recevez une notification automatique lorsqu'une nouvelle mise à jour de 
> > > %PRODUCTNAME est disponible. (French)
> > 
> > The phrasing implies one cannot opt out from these notifications. In
> > reality, options allow to disable these checks even if the component is
> > installed.
> > 
> > I suggest to rectify by indicating the behavior is optional, with a label
> > like:
> > 
> > 
> > > Allows to be notified when a new update of %PRODUCTNAME becomes available.
> 
> I personally don't think such a rewording would be useful, neither in light
> of that optional component potentially going away anyway (see above), nor in
> making it more clear what that option does (many things can be turned off in
> LO's options pages, still we don't generally phrase the corresponding
> features as "allows to have this feature available, unless you switch it
> off").

The quoted fragment is basically nonsensical, and I hope no one suggested
anything like that.


> I'll thus tentatively close as WONTFIX.  If you disagree, please reopen and
> add the "needsUXEval" keyword.

Can you clarify what you mean by "close as WONTFIX"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to