https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160692
--- Comment #3 from Telesto <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 193708 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193708&action=edit Screenshot (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > (In reply to Telesto from comment #0) > > So simply behave as Calc does. A 'dot' (square) without numbering > But Calc has an intrinsic positional structure and you cannot have two > comments on one cell, what is possible with Draw/Impress. Some > identification is necessary, and I never got intimidated by the number. => WF I admit I overlooked the 'insert comment', without moving the comment. So if it's a nice list of 'tabs' which being comments on the slide/page as a whole. Although I'm surprised you being able to identify the the content of a comment by number 1;2;3;4;5? Not something I'm able to do. And surely not for documents authored couple of week back. I tend to identify the comment/relevance by position on the slide/drawing board. Numbering makes look chaotic/erratic without any value. You get the effect as in the screenshot. --- Alternative solution would be a 'comment' truly added to the object (line/shape/image) as meta-data. In a similar fashion as 'Text'/ Alt-Text'. However text/alt-text is actually intended for 'accessibility tools' and invisible (except for accessibility tools). This is actually a comment (note) for the author without visual impairments. Different purpose/goal It's also similar to adding a name to an object; say double clicking a square. Except naming an object is intended to be visible. A comment is hidden property with can be easily accessed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
