https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160686
--- Comment #10 from David <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #9) > Bug reports don't need "support". You don't see a refutation of my claims. I hereby explicitly refute your claim as per my use case described in comment #8. > These are not, and can't be, the styles of "Right Page"'s or "Left Page"'s, > whatever that means; so they must be removed. Then what would you call them given my use case? Maybe just call them Right-side Only and Left-side Only pages, although the configuration options seem to make plain what is meant. > Note that this is far beyond, say, the Landscape style, which one has to > actively undermine in order for it to be non-Landscape. Here, it's enough to > apply the "Odd Page" style to a non-odd page, or make an odd page non-odd by > extending a previous page sequence with a page break anywhere in between, to > get to a situation where each of these two styles applies to some odd pages > as well as some even pages. Are you saying that the page numbers will be incorrect if you directly insert a page break instead of allowing a heading style to insert a page break and a Right Only or Left Only page? Even if that were the case, please provide a document that demonstrates the problem (though a direct page insert would be considered a poor practice). I have yet to see this issue in a real-life document, though I use these styles frequently. > It is just a non-serious attempt to salvage a wrong idea someone had at some > point about adding the "Right Page" and "Left Page" styles. Why are you so > attached to these styles? Maybe because no viable, better alternative to my real-life use case has yet been provided. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
