https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157406
--- Comment #7 from Hossein <[email protected]> --- I reviewed this issue today, and I think this can not be considered as an EasyHack. In an EasyHack, it is obvious what should be implemented, and then, code pointers are provided to do that implementation. Considering comment 6 from Mike, it is not obvious how this issue should be handled. I agree with Mike's suggestion to provide "more detailed" warning, but then it will be also out of the scope of an EasyHack. @Heiko: If you do not object, I will remove the easyHack keyword. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
