https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161078
Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Allow direct formatting of |Allow direct formatting for
|page sequences |page sequences instead of
| |editing the style
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #21 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> ---
FWIW: I do relate with the issue described in comment 10 and bug 161075 and I
grasp why DF is proposed. I have had quite frustration with rotating some pages
from portrait to landscape. Why does it require a new page style. Seems a bit
excessive. And the lack of inheritable page styles surely makes it worse. I
need to have dedicated style, only for page rotation purposes?
Applying a page style to the proper range is quite an exercise; IMHO. I surely
got the feeling I was fighting the software. I have posted quite a list of
bugs, like bug 136412; bug 136961 in the past (somewhat mediocre quality). I
keep finding the current model skewed in various aspects. I still think: how
can it be that simply rotating a page can be that hard (and frustrating and
unintuitive). Apparently others can work with it...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
