https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234
--- Comment #7 from ady <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > I don't see an absolute value as a solution Please forgive my ignorance. If I may ask, why? What's the reasoning? I think of the active-cell line marker in a similar way as other auxiliary UI elements: * auxiliary lines such as active-cell border line mark, selected-cells background color, trace-dependent and trace-precedent lines and arrows, the fill handle, comment indicator... are all examples of a secondary auxiliary layer; * cell contents, cell results, graphs, and even cell borders applied by the user, are part of one main layer. So, again, please forgive my ignorance... I don't see the reason to make the auxiliary artifacts directly proportional to the zoom factor exactly the same as cells, graphs and other main items. I can understand the possible need to tweak the auxiliary layer when it is not displayed adequately under some conditions (color contrast, screen resolution, zoom factor, dark theme...), but growing/shrinking these auxiliary items proportionally to zoom factor would seem to me (and to my workflow) a negative point. OTOH, I'm just a common user that might not understand enough about UX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
