https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161032
Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33 | |060 Keywords| |needsDevAdvice --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- Seems to be a FAQ: Bug 136010 - Cannot disable extensions installed by package manager (=> NAB) Bug 33060 - Bundled extensions can not be disabled (=> WF) Bug 55364 - Bundled Extensions create huge amount of files in appdata (=> WFM) Bug 53009 - Large UserInstallation's user/extensions/bundled/ tree (=> FIXED) Bug 32377 - *NO* Bundled Extensions, please Stephan did a lot work around this topic. He argued in bug 33060 comment 19 "...obvious use case for bundled (and/or shared) extensions is to let an admin install an extension that enforces some feature", and for dictionaries "The original rationale for that was that these could have different update cycles than LO...". I support the request however. The admin who wants to protect extensions is one use case but there is also the average user who should have full control over the application. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
