https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161255

--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10)
> Don't think UX can contribute more to the topic.

Actually, UX can, at least in the following senses:

* Sometimes, enabling support is obvious; sometimes, there's no indication in
favor of it; and sometimes, there's some indication (for example: You're using
a Western locale, UI etc. in a country in which a fraction of the population is
Muslim) . How far do we bias in favor of enabling RTL-CTL or CJK in such cases?
i.e. where on the spectrum should we be?

* Is it acceptable and is it reasonable to place explicit checkboxes for
RTL-CTL and for CJK in the installation program (assuming it's not a DEB/RPM
and such)?

* Is it really better to apply a heuristic, or should we just always-enable as
is suggested in bug 161258? Do the detriments of enabling support for all
languages outweigh the benefit of potential use?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to