https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62355
--- Comment #8 from Yury <[email protected]> --- Even the simplest use of combining diacritics like {hat A} or {tilde A} *by means of formula editor "catalog"* might go wrong. The BIG problem is glyphs accessed via "catalog" (tilde, hat etc.) are taken from the "Open Symbol" face, included in LibO out-of-the-box (at least on Linux). And so, certain combinations of glyph heights of body text face and "Open Symbol" diacritics just go wrong. E.g., "Open Symbol" diacritics combine well with "Gentium Plus" capitals, but no so well with "Linux Libertine O" capitals. So not every font face is actually usable in Formula Editor! IF one changes the "catalog" face from "Open Symbol" to something else (in Tools->Options->Fonts dialog), one is not out of the woods yet. There is another, related problem, which *probably* merits another ticket: formula renderer assumes (?) the combining diacritics in the "catalog" face do not actually combine. Or something. The fact is some combinations of faces are rendered with diacritics far to the left of the glyph over which it ought to be placed. I'm attaching the sample doc, all set in "Gentium Plus", and TWO screenshots, rendered (1) with font substitution "Open Symbol->Gentium Plus" AND (2) without such substitution. The doc contains: (1) plain text "A {tilde A}" equivalent (shows the correct tilde placement); (2.1) formula "A {tilde A}", with "Gentium Plus" tilde (not so correct placement); (2.2) same formula with "Open Symbol" tilde (not correct at all). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
