https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161555
Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org Keywords| |needsUXEval --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1) > I do not think, that such "Fragment" operation is so often requested, that a > special command is necessary. As opposed to XOR-combine? Come on.... > Mark the two objects together and create two copies of the pair. With first > pair do "Subtract", with second pair do "Intersect". In third pair put front > object back and do "Subtract". This won't even work as described, because the overlapping copies will prevent me from making the right selections. But if I do move the shape copies out of the way, I will then need to move the operated-on shapes back, and make sure they line up perfectly - which also means having to write down the exact coordinates. And that might not even be possible, since the shape properties limits the accuracy of coordinate entry. And I haven't even mentioned the need to make sure that where I move the copy, it's all clear so that I don't drag other shapes back by mistake... So, that's not even effectively a solution - and if it were, it would require a inordinate amount of effort. Also, let's also look at MS Visio's shape operations: https://youtu.be/jPocgphVUyE?si=-eVvBj9dFkxLip-K&t=76 Union, Combine, Fragment, Intersect, Subtract guess which one we're missing? :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
