https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161592
--- Comment #17 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #11) > Created attachment 194767 [details] > Same calculation but different amount of formulas > > I have made an example from scratch. I see the error depending on the amount > of formulas on the sheet. The two sheets only differ, that in one sheet the > range goes to row 813 (fail) whereas in the other sheet it goes to row 812 > (good). To test the sheets change the value in cell B2. > > I have tested the document in AOO4, in a portable OOo3.2.0 and in LO3.5.4. > They fail too for 813 and they are good for 812. > > There had been some bug reports about curious calculations in these group of > functions, that could not be reproduced at that time. Perhaps you need a > document with a large enough amount of formulas to see the defect. bibisect-linux64-6.1 points me to author Eike Rathke <[email protected]> 2018-03-23 13:13:03 +0100 committer Eike Rathke <[email protected]> 2018-03-23 13:14:51 +0100 commit c53235ba9aab844c4b16ecf7a28429e256bace6d (patch) tree 311352c29fbe8e94d648926a50c6bc5c407a3771 parent 604df2f608c03a59be65822d27babf0b00714bd6 (diff) Enable binary search for numeric values again but if I revert the patch locally it doesn't fix the issue... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
