https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150433
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org --- Comment #7 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Theppitak Karoonboonyanan from comment #5) > The license of this patch is specified in th_TH/README_thes_th_TH.txt > as CC-0 1.0, based on the data source it was converted from. > > Of course, it could either be CC-0 as before to maintain its permissiveness, > or be relicensed to MPLv2/LGPLv3+ if required by the project. > > In case it could be CC-0, would it conflict with my license statement > to always have my contributions be under MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license? > Or would it simply be overridden by the license statement in the patch? > > In general, I prefer my future code contributions to be under MPLv2/LGPLv3+, > BTW, but the source of this one is such permissive. Grepping in the dictionaries repo I see others with CC-0 as well, so I will go ahead and merge the patch. You can then close this as fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
